Section
1
Transformations
in Early Modern European Society
Despite the long-term impact of the
Renaissance and the early Reformation, daily life changed little for
ordinary Europeans in the 1400s and 1500s. For all its creativity,
the Renaissance was largely an upper-class movement. For ordinary
Europeans, the old religious worldview of the Middle Ages remained a
central feature of life—along with the everyday toils of an
agricultural existence. By the 1600s and 1700s, however, the
discoveries of European explorers and the upheaval of the Protestant
Reformation were transforming the European economy and calling into
question many of the church’s teachings. Rising levels of
insecurity, both material and spiritual, made life increasingly
unpredictable. As a result, many ordinary Europeans began to
question the old certainties and to seek new ways to explain the
chaos in the world around them.
Breakdown of the Medieval Social
Order
Most medieval Europeans believed that all of God's creations in the
universe existed in particular relationships with one another. All
things and all people had been assigned their places in what many
scholars and theologians called the Great
Chain of Being. At the top of the Chain was God Himself. He
revealed His will through a vast hierarchy of nature, first through
various orders of angels, then the prophets and apostles, who
revealed the divine will to the church and through the church
hierarchy to the ordinary believer. Society too, they believed,
reflected this same hierarchical structure. Monarchs functioned as
the head of what the ancient Greeks called the “Body Politic.”
Nobles and knights, who made up the armies, were the arms of
society. Merchants and artisans were the hands, while peasants and
serfs acted as the feet.
Economic changes. By the 1500s,[x][x] however, this medieval view of
society had begun to break down under the realities of economic and
social change. European population had risen sharply since a low
point caused by the outbreaks of the Black Death in the late Middle
Ages. At first, this increase in population had been beneficial,
providing more children who could work and earn money for their
families. Soon, however, farmers could not produce enough food to
feed so many mouths. People in rural villages began to migrate to
towns and cities to work as laborers. With so many laborers
available, wages began to fall, even as food prices began to rise
due to the lack of food surpluses.
The rise in prices also affected European landlords. Although
not on the verge of starvation, they too felt squeezed by rising
prices without an equal rise in their incomes. As they sought new
sources of money, many began to fence in their lands, including
those that had once been considered common lands for local farmers
and villagers. This process of enclosures
allowed landowners to combine parcels of land that had previously
been farmed separately by several tenant farmers. Larger parcels
could be farmed more efficiently and profitably than small ones.
Farmers who had once farmed as they liked now found themselves
reduced to the status of wage laborers for the landowners.
Town life. While peasants in
the countryside struggled against changing circumstances, town and
city-dwellers also experienced considerable transformations in early
modern Europe. During the 1500s,[xi][xi] the class of merchants and
guild people that had developed in the Middle Ages became
increasingly more important. They brought a great deal of new wealth
and trade to towns and had a higher standard of living than other
commoners. They had better houses, more money, and more luxury
items. As they grew in wealth, and feudal distinctions increasingly
broke down, some even began to join the lower ranks of the nobility
through marriage or by service to the crown.
Women were an important part of this new prosperity. They
helped their husbands run family businesses and looked after the
apprentices. An English merchant, for example, admired the skill of
both Dutch men and women in trade:
" [they are] well versed in all
sorts of languages . . . Nor are the Men only expert therein but the
Women and Maids also . . .in Holland the Wives are so well versed in
Bargaining, Cyphering & Writing, that in the Absence of their
Husbands in long sea voyages they beat the trade at home and their
Words will pass in equal Credit."
Over time, nobles and monarchs became more and more dependent
on the wealth of this growing middle
class to finance armies and conduct trade. Often, monarchs
looked to alliances with merchants and artisans of the towns to
overcome the opposition of their nobles. As kings used the money
provided by such townspeople to assert their authority over the
nobility, the middle class became more influential in the decisions
of local government. This new alliance between kings and commons
would soon lead to revolutionary developments in the organization of
European states.
Family and Community
Despite the changes occurring in European society, some things remained
essentially the same. The basic unit of society remained the family.
People usually lived in small families, consisting of a father, a
mother, and several children. Only rarely were other relations such
as grandparents, aunts, and uncles included in a household.
The father was the head of the family. Servants and
apprentices reported to the wife. Although women helped run family
businesses and worked in the fields, their main responsibility was
to bear and raise children. Often this was a dangerous and painful
responsibility, as the wife of one Jewish merchant of the day made
clear in a personal memoir:
"The next time I came with child I
suffered terribly. I came down with a fever, God save us! in my
seventh month, . . . If it began in the morning I suffered chills
for four whole hours, then I burned for four hours, and finally, for
four hours again, I sweat, and that was worse than either the chills
or the burning. You may imagine my torments."
Next to the family, most people in early modern Europe
identified with their local community. In towns this still meant
members of one’s profession. Rural communities too remained
relatively small, usually no more than 20 to 100 families. In both
cases, such small groups allowed for close relationships as members
of the community worked and made decisions together.
Quarrels and arguments between neighbors were also common,
however, and although local communities were usually tightly knit,
the bonds of friendship and mutual reliance that held them together
could also loosen in times of stress. As the general level of
security in their lives dropped, for example, they might look for
someone to blame for their growing problems. Often they picked on
the least popular of their neighbors. In the 1500s and 1600s[xii][xii] this pattern led to one of
the great tragedies in European history, the Great Witch Hunts.
Witchcraft and Witch Hunts
Since the days before the Roman Empire and Christianity, most people in
Europe had believed in magic and the existence of witches as the
best means of explaining both good and bad fortune in their lives.
Many villagers relied for advice and assistance on local “wise”
people, usually an old woman with special knowledge of the healing
powers of herbs. Yet just as they believed these special powers
might be used to help people, most Europeans also believed they
could be used to harm. Such beliefs became especially powerful
during times of trouble, when misfortunes seemed to multiply for no
apparent reason.
During the later Middle Ages, European conceptions of
supernatural powers and the beings who wielded them became
increasingly complex. European began viewing magic and witchcraft
from a Christian perspective, increasingly identifying both with the
Devil. Eventually, people came to believe that witches had made a
pact with the Devil, through which they gained the power to fly and
to change themselves into animals. Witches also were thought to
gather at night in the woods, where they would dance and perform
rituals worshipping the Devil.
Most people believed that witches practiced maleficia,
or harmful magic. If crops failed, livestock died, or people became
sick, someone might accuse a person of having used witchcraft to
cause the misfortune. Older women and widows were especially
vulnerable to accusations of witchcraft, since they could not easily
defend themselves. They also often lived alone and without anyone to
help them. In a society that valued community, such “outsiders”
often excited peoples’ suspicions. Men also could be accused of
witchcraft, however, particularly if they had become rich enough to
inspire jealousy. Jews and other minority groups also were easy
targets.
People accused of being witches were tried as criminals. The
accused were relentlessly questioned, and witnesses testified to the
supposed acts of witchcraft they had seen. If the accused did not
quickly admit their guilt, they were often tortured until they did.
Such practices made sense to people who viewed the world from a
religious standpoint, for they believed that people were most likely
to tell the truth if they believed they were on the verge of death.
To lie in such circumstances was to risk eternal damnation.
The consequences of such logic were often gruesome, as the
following description by an observer of a Scottish witch trial
interrogation in 1591[xiii][xiii] illustrates:
"His nailes upon all his fingers
were riven and pulled off. . . . Then was hee. . . convaied again to
the torment of the bootes, wherein hee continued a long time and did
abide so many blowes in them, that his legges were crusht and beaten
together as small as might be, and his bones and flesh so bruised,
that the bloud. . . spouted forth in great abundance."
After suffering such torment, admitting his guilt must almost have been a
relief to the accused. As it was, he was lucky to be confessing in
Scotland. In both England and Scotland witchcraft (maleficia)
was considered a civil crime. The penalty was merely death by
hanging. In the rest of Europe, the association of witches with
devil-worship led the church to brand them as heretics. The
punishment for heresy was burning at the stake.
The number of witch trials increased during the 1500s and
1600s, as Europe was shaken by religious warfare and peasant
revolts.[xiv][xiv] Town and church leaders, as
well as country nobles, saw the existence of witches as a reasonable
explanation for the problems in the world around them. Many hoped to
head off trouble by tracking down and eliminating the witches in
their domains. The great witch hunts of early modern Europe thus
reflected above all people's growing sense of insecurity and a loss
of control over their lives.
As the religious wars came to an end, however, and security
returned to most people’s lives, fewer and fewer cases of
witchcraft were reported. In addition, as Europeans began to
question the old doctrines of the church and to learn more about the
nature of the world around them, they developed a new worldview
rooted in science. This new worldview led many to doubt even the
existence of witches, and to demand more concrete proofs of guilt
than those obtained by torture.