Chapter 28 Postwar Latin America |
Section
3 |
The Latin
American radicals, reformers, and conservatives did not debate their
future alone. After World War II, the United States became deeply involved
in Latin American politics. Before the war, the United States businesses
had expanded throughout Latin America. American companies owned factories,
mines, plantations, electrical utilities, telephone companies, and
shipping lines. The United States government, through the "Good
Neighbor" policy, sent aid to Latin American countries and helped
them to develop their militaries. After the war, the United States sought
to promote a stable environment for American investments in Latin America
and to prevent the spread of communism. The Cold War and Latin America After World War
II, the foremost concern of the U.S. was to rebuild Europe so that a
strong Europe could counterbalance the growing power of the Soviet Union.
Since available resources went to Western Europe, Latin America received
little aid after the war. As the cold war quickly came to dominate the
foreign policy of the United States, the problems of Latin America were
seen by the U.S. in this cold war framework. The U.S. feared that the
Soviet Union would incite revolutions in Latin America in order to expand
the Soviet Bloc. The fear of a Soviet presence in Latin America led the
U.S. to mistrust the reformers in Latin America. In the eyes of many
Americans, Latin American reformers seemed "soft" on communism. Cuba. As the Cuban Revolution became more radical in 1960
and 1961, relations between the United States and Cuba deteriorated
rapidly. The United States government protested the nationalization of
American-owned property in Cuba. The growing power of communists in the
revolutionary government led both President Eisenhower and his successor
President Kennedy to authorize a covert operation against Castro. In
Miami, the Central Intelligence Agency had no trouble recruiting Cubans to
participate in a covert operation directed against the Cuban Revolution.
Castro's spies infiltrated the operation, however, giving the Cubans time
to prepare for it. As a result, Castro defeated the invasion at the Bay
of Pigs in April of 1961.
Embarrassment over the Bay of Pigs fiasco was soon overshadowed by
the more dangerous Cuban missile crisis. As part of the compromise that
ended the crisis, President Kennedy had promised that the United States
would not invade Cuba. Instead, he and succeeding American presidents
determined to quarantine, or isolate Cuba as much as possible from the
rest of the Americas. The United States declared an economic boycott
against Cuba. No U.S. company or individual would be allowed to engage in
business with Cuba. Through the Organization of American States, the
United States asked other Latin American nations to boycott Cuba as well.
With the exception of Mexico, Latin America shunned Cuba. Nicaragua. Despite the quarantine, American fears that Cuba
would spread the seeds of revolution throughout the region were soon
justified. Perhaps the most successful revolutionary movement in the
Caribbean region outside Cuba occurred in Nicaragua. In 1979, a coalition
of groups ranging from radical revolutionaries known as the Sandinistas
to moderate reformers rose in revolt against the corrupt and
oppressive dictator Anastasio Somoza. As Somoza fled with his family the
Sandinistas took control of the government.
Establishing a ruling junta under their leader Daniel Ortega,
however, the Sandinistas did not implement the democratic reforms the
other members of the anti-Somoza coalition had expected. Instead, Ortega
and his colleagues established close ties with Fidel Castro in Cuba and
proceeded to build a communist dictatorship in Nicaragua. Confronted by
this replacement of the Somoza dictatorship with that of the Sandinistas,
many of the former revolutionaries began to agitate for the freedoms they
thought they had been fighting for. The United States too opposed the
Marxist Sandinistas, seeing them as an outpost of both the Soviet Union
and Cuba. Under President Reagan, the United States imposed an embargo on
Nicaragua and did its best to destabilize the Sandinista regime.
Eventually, under one of the Sandinista’s own former leaders,
Eden Pastora, some of the disillusioned reformers, supported with arms and
money by the United States, organized a new guerrilla group called the Contras
to overthrow the Sandinistas. Even after the U.S. Congress cut off funds
for the Contras in 1984, covert, or hidden aid continued to flow from
government officials within the Reagan White House to the Contras. Under
this pressure and due to the inefficiency of their own economic policies,
the Sandinista economy declined sharply and the regime lost much of its
popularity. The spread of revolution.
Like Cuba under Castro, the Sandinista regime hoped to export its
revolution to neighboring countries. For example, the Sandinistas
encouraged radical guerrilla groups in neighboring El Salvador to
challenge their conservative government. Honduras too was soon sucked into
the storm raised by the Sandinistas. Anxious to stop the spread of the
communist contagion, the United States provided massive military and
financial aid to transform Honduras into a staging base for Contra
activities. Such intervention, although it boosted the Honduran economy,
also threatened to undermine the new and still-fragile civilian control of
the country that had only just been reestablished after decades of
military rule. Panama. Growing political unrest also affected nearby
Panama. After World War II, Panama shared the same pattern of economic
growth and political turmoil as its other Central American neighbors. The
most burning question in Panamanian politics, however, concerned
Panamanian demands for full control over the Panama Canal. Both the canal
and the ten-mile wide Canal Zone surrounding it remained in the hands of
the United States. Despite violent opposition from many in the United
States, in 1979 the U.S. Senate ratified a treaty that called for the
gradual transfer of the canal to the Panamanians by 1999.
By the late 1980s a new dispute between the U.S. and Panama had
arisen. U.S. officials accused Panamanian dictator General Manuel Noriega
of aiding Colombian drug lords smuggle their narcotics into the United
States. President Reagan tried to pressure Noriega into resigning. When
this failed, the president cut off all American aid, both military and
economic, to the dictator. When Panamanian soldiers killed one American
soldier and detained and beat another in 1989, President George Bush
ordered 10,000 American troops to invade Panama and capture Noriega. The
invasion was a success and Noriega was captured and taken to Florida,
where he was later convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for drug
trafficking. The Contadora
initiative As violence thus
continued to rock the countries of Central America, the larger nations of
the region began to search for some means of restoring peace. In 1983, the
leaders of Venezuela, Panama, Colombia, and Mexico met and signed the
so-called Contadora Document of
Objectives. Named for the island on which the meetings took place, the Contadora proposals called for an immediate freeze on arms sales and
general military reductions throughout the region. In addition, the
agreement called for negotiations rather than violence to settle all
regional disputes.
Although the United States did not ratify the Contadora
agreement, in 1987 representatives from all the Central American countries
met in Guatemala City for a regional peace conference. During the
conference, Oscar Arias, president of the small country of Costa Rica, one
of the few economically and politically stable countries in Central
America, put forward a comprehensive plan designed to bring peace to the
region.
Like other reformers, Arias saw a strong connection between peace
and the growth of democracy. In addition to calling for an end to all
fighting in the region and negotiated peace settlements, he also proposed
an end to all foreign aid for rebel groups and for substantial democratic
reforms in all countries involved in the fighting. In a public speech he
made an appeal for what might be seen as a classic statement of the
reformists goals: “The democracy
in which many American nations live today cannot be consolidated without
economic development and social justice. Before any political or economic
conditions can be imposed on the democracies of the Americas, there must
be a commitment from the Western world to strengthen democracy in all our
nations. in the Americas, peace must be democratic, pluralistic, tolerant,
and free. While dogmatism [intolerance] and intransigence [stubbornness]
persist and there is no dialogue, peace will be impossible. Working
together for democracy, freedom, and development is working together for
peace.”[16] Costa Rica, El
Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and the United States supported Arias’s
proposals. Arias received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 for his efforts.
Not until the early 1990s, however, did signs appear that peace might
indeed be at hand in Central America.
As the Cold War came to an end, and the Soviet Union no longer
supported Cuba and other revolutionary movements, the level of
revolutionary violence finally began to lessen. In Nicaragua, in 1990
Daniel Ortega agreed to new elections and the return of democratic rule.
Although many Sandinista leaders remained in powerful positions,
especially in the army, and some Sandinista leaders apparently enriched
themselves from the national treasury, Ortega peacefully relinquished
power when the people elected reform-minded Violeta Chamorro, owner and
editor of La Prensa, Nicaragua’s largest and most respected newspaper, as
president.
BIO Violeta Barrios de
Chamorro was born in 1929 into a wealthy ranching family in the Nicaraguan
town of Rivas. Well-educated as a child due to her family’s wealth, in
1950 she married Pedro Joaquin Chamorro Cardenal, a member of one of
Nicaragua’s leading families. The editor of the family newspaper La
Prensa, Pedro Chamorro Cardenal carried on his family’s traditional
opposition to the Somoza dictatorship. Frequently imprisoned and sometimes
even exiled for his anti-Somoza views, in 1978 he was assassinated,
probably by government agents. His murder sparked the revolution that
brought down the Somozas.
As Cardenal’s widow, Violeta Chamorro took a leading role in the
struggle against Somoza. She also initially supported the Sandinistas.
After Somoza’s flight in 1979, for example, she was one of the five
members of the ruling junta that took power. As the Sandanistas turned
more and more toward Marxism, however, Chamorro became disillusioned with
the movement. Eventually she resigned from the junta and took over the
editorship of La Prensa.
Although members of her own family, including some of her children
remained Sandanista supporters, by 1989 Violeta had emerged as the leading
opposition candidate to Daniel Ortega. When Ortega finally agreed to free
elections, in 1990 Violeta Chamorro became Nicaragua’s first woman
president and a symbol of the triumph of democracy. Despite continuing
tensions between the Sandinistas and the new government, democracy seemed
finally to have arrived in Nicaragua.
In El Salvador, the government and the FMLN, under pressure from
the United States, Russia, and Mexico, also came to tentative agreement on
constitutional reforms. Even Panama began the new decade under a
democratic coalition government made up of anti-Noriega parties, as the
American invasion force quickly withdrew. Although the coalition did not
last long, Panamanians seemed committed at last to maintaining democracy
rather than returning to the path of military dictatorship. Mexico Not all the
countries of Central America and the Caribbean experienced the kind of
political upheaval and bloodshed seen in Nicaragua. The largest country of
the region, and the most stable, was Mexico. Even Mexico could not escape
some upheaval, however. In 1968, for example, numerous confrontations
occurred between radical student protesters and the police. The largest of
these demonstrations ended in gunfire when Mexican troops fired into a
crowd that refused to disperse in the city of Tlateloco. Hundreds of
students died in the hail of gunfire. The government carried out similar
hard-line tactics when a radical guerrilla campaign began in 1971 in an
effort to undermine Mexico’s democracy. Ruthlessly, the government
hunted down and killed or imprisoned the rebels and by the end of the
decade the threat of revolution had practically disappeared. Economic problems. Despite its relative political stability,
like other Latin American countries Mexico suffered considerable economic
instability after the war largely due to rising inflation and a negative
balance of trade. The discovery of huge oil reserves in the 1970s made the
future seem considerably brighter. The nation’s earnings from oil
skyrocketed from about $500 million in 1976 to some $13 billion in 1981.
At the same time, the government used these revenues to raise even greater
development loans. When oil prices slumped in the 1980s, economic disaster
loomed. Compounding Mexico’s problems, a devastating earthquake in 1985
leveled much of Mexico City, leaving tens of thousands of people homeless.
The costs of rebuilding only further expanded the national debt. By 1988,
Mexico’s annual inflation rate had risen to 143 percent and by 1989 the
foreign debt was over $100 billion.[17]
In the face of these economic challenges, the Mexican government
began to loosen many of the controls it had placed on the national
economy. Under President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, who took office in
1988, the government also began to negotiate free trade agreements with
Mexico’s major trading partners. Reversing a longstanding policy of the
nationalist party that had ruled the coutry since 1929, Salinas began to
permit foreign ownership of Mexican businesses and to sell off the
government’s own extensive business holdings in an effort to encourage
investment in the country. Salinas also pushed hard for ratification of
the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA—which established a
free trade zone with the United States and Canada. Nevertheless, by the
mid-1990s, economic pressures forced the government to devalue the peso,
further weakening confidence in the Mexican economy. Economic prosperity
remained elusive. Emigration problems. As
its economy floundered, like its Latin American neighbors Mexico too
experienced a constantly rising population. With more and more people,
jobs became scarcer and scarcer. Many Mexicans, like Latin Americans from
further south, looked for jobs in the United States. Thousands began to
cross the border into the United States in search of work—some legally,
but many more illegally.
As tensions rose between the U.S. and Mexico over the illegal
immigration issue, in 1986 the United States Congress passed the
Immigration Reform and Control Act. While legalizing the presence of
aliens who had entered the country illegally before January 1, 1982, the
Act also tried to restrict further illegal immigration by requiring
American employers to check all job applicants for their residency status.
Meanwhile, both the Mexican government and the U.S. government hoped that
efforts to improve Mexico’s own economy would result in fewer immigrants
seeking to cross the border into the United States. Echoes of political instability. The
growing problems of the 1980s and early 90s also undermined the hold of
the ruling PRI on Mexico’s political life. With democratic and
pluralistic movements sweeping across other parts of the globe after the
downfall of the Soviet Union, so too Salinas and his colleagues began to
loosen PRI’s monopoly on Mexican politics. At the same time, more and
more people were becoming disillusioned with the seemingly corrupt nature
of the Institutional Revolutionary Party. Many began to join opposition
parties.
The first signs of PRI’s eroding position came in the elections
of 1988, which many opposition leaders believed had been won by fraud. In
1994, the country was shocked when PRI’s initial candidate for the
presidency, Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta, a reform-minded politician, was
assassinated. Even more shocking was the suggestion that hard-line,
conservative elements in PRI itself were responsible for the murder.
Despite the turmoil, however, PRI’s second choice candidate, Ernesto
Zedillo Ponce de Leon was elected president with just over 50 percent of
the vote.
The position of PRI was also challenged by events in the Yucatan.
There, in the southeastern state of Chiapas, a new revolutionary guerrilla
group calling itself the Zapatista National Liberation Army emerged in
early 1994 to challenge government control of the region. The rebels
represented the interests of the local Mayan population, which continued
to cherish its own separate sense of identity within Mexico. After some
fighting, eventually the government agreed to talks with the rebels, who
demanded reforms to improve the economic situation in Chiapas as well as
concessions designed to grant greater protection and autonomy to the Mayan
population of the region. |